|

What it Takes to Compete in the New “Flat World”
by
H. Wilson Beach
P. Anthony Burnham, Esq.
Leslie H. Gray
GrowthPort Partners, Inc.
In “The World Is Flat,” Thomas Friedman points out that
ubiquitous telecommunications have removed all of the barriers to full-blown
international competition. This has created a level playing field where
cheap foreign labor is forcing large and small American companies to
become even more innovative in order to survive in the 21st century.
To counter this growing threat, a number of analysts have sited the
continuously improving productivity of the American worker as a positive
sign that the challenge can be met. Many of these same analysts also
appear to have concluded that this increase is principally (if not solely)
due to technological innovation. In fact, many (including Mr. Friedman)
appear to imply that the future survival of American business will depend
entirely on continued technological innovation.
A
Different Perspective
Our 85 year
experience as a CEO and a senior HR Executives of more than a dozen
manufacturing and service companies has led us to suggest a much different
reason for this critical improvement. Namely, that the key resource
for improving productivity in non-IT organizations is not technology,
but people. We contend that the principal means of surviving in a Flat
World is the combination of such innovations with the creation and retention
of an engaged and therefore increasingly productive workforce.
Supporting this view is research indicating that much of the increase
in productivity since 2000 has been the result of requiring employees
to work longer hours to accommodate increased demand. According to a
May 2006 report by Kevin J. Stiroh from the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, since 2000 IT is not the principal source of productivity
in non-IT industries. He suggest that this is a signal of a broader
range of explanations such as organizational change, human capital,
intangible investment, as well as other broader macro forces including
cyclical productivity, all motivated by increased competition and pressures.
Longer
Hours Aren’t the Solution
But simply
requiring your employees to work longer hours isn’t the solution.
Research reported by Evan Robinson makes it clear that simply working
your employee long hours isn’t the way to achieve sustained increases
in productivity. In fact, Robinson makes a persuasive case that in the
long run it’s the single most expensive way there is to get the
work done, suggesting that long-term, longer hours slows development
and creates more bugs when compared with 40-hour weeks. He sites a century
of studies indicating that long-term useful worker output is maximized
near a five-day, 40-hour workweek and that productivity actually drops
upon starting overtime. Robinson concludes that longer periods of continuous
work drastically reduce cognitive function and increase the chance of
catastrophic error. What is needed then is greater employee productivity
for each of those 40-hours.
Engaged
Employees – the key to Productivity, Customer Satisfaction &
Profitability
The good news for employers is that number of important studies (and
the hands on experience of the authors) support the position that an
engaged employee can achieve this goal by: a) being far more productive
in terms of sales, profit per customer, units produced, and quality
(or any other measure you can name) than the average employee - they
are typically 10 times more productive than the average employee, and
often generate 30X more than the lower 10 percent in an organization;
b) they also consistently achieve greater customer satisfaction and
retention; c) provide breakthrough innovations that increase customer
satisfaction & retention, sales, productivity and/or reduce costs;
d) generally raise the production and morale of co-workers, and; e)
are significantly less expensive in terms of absenteeism, complaints,
law suits, work related accidents, and the resulting insurance costs.
In fact, dozens of studies over more than 50 years have repeatedly demonstrated
the importance of engaged employees on the long-term success (and sometimes
survival) of all manner of for-profit and not-for-profit organizations
the world over.
How
to create and retain an Engaged Workforce
What has to happen for the creation of an engaged and productive employee
is for management and HR professionals to gain a clear understanding
of the cause and effect relationship between people-productivity-profitability.
According to a study appearing in the Gallop Organization’s May
2003 Journal, “when executives say, "Our people are our most
valuable asset," they’re usually expressing an emotion, not
citing evidence. That’s why it’s often difficult for them
to justify spending time and money to develop and recognize employees.”
Absent this evidence, it is critical that HR professionals begin to
develop a clear understanding and systematic approach to the use of
employment practices in achieving increased productivity, customer satisfaction
and profitability. This also means that HR professionals must be willing
to have their contributions evaluated by the inclusion of metrics such
as Sales/Productivity/Employee, ROA/Employee, and Profitability/Employee.
In pursuing this goal it is important for CEO’s and HR professionals
to appreciate that nearly all of the research on worker engagement and
productivity to date is based on studies of larger organizations. This
is important because many of the programs and methods being advocated
for improving worker engagement call for investments that may be beyond
the reach of smaller companies. This is significant when you consider
the fact that small companies (fewer than 150 employees) have generated
more than 80% of net job growth in the U.S over the past twenty years.
It is clear from this fact that America’s future prosperity will
depend on the development of productivity enhancing methods and programs
that are affordable and can be implemented by this nation’s small
to mid-sized companies.
The good new for small to mid-sized employers is that increased workforce
engagement and productivity can be achieved without a huge investment
by understanding a number of principals and the systematic application
of a number of management/employment practices.
A
Holistic Approach
Before describing each step in this process and its impact on productivity,
it is important to emphasize that they should be viewed as flexible
parts of an interdependent whole, or system. A change in one practice
affects all the others. To be effective, managers need to know how each
practice interacts with (and impacts) the other practices within the
system. No single practice should be viewed in isolation, or as some
kind of panacea for boosting productivity.
This approach also underlines the importance of tracking the impact
of management/HR practices on engagement, productivity, customer satisfaction,
and profitability, rather than the efficiency of HR functions (cost
of hire, cost of turnover, etc.).
Here then are the basic steps and practices that will boost the engagement
and productivity of your workforce:
Management
Practices
-
Be sure
your company is Customer Driven and Employee Focused. Research has
shown that just 3% of all small companies produce more than 80%
of all net job-growth. These companies are not just hi-tech, but
are found in roughly equal numbers in all industries. They succeed
by providing uniquely effective, “hassle-free,” and
reasonably priced solutions to their customer’s ever-changing
needs. They also recognize and acknowledge that engaged employees
are the key to their success.
-
Develop
and communicate useful Mission & Values Statements based on
customer needs and your company’s uniquely competitive (and
employee driven) approach to meeting those needs. Since this is
the foundation for everything that follows, be sure this vital information
is known and understood by all of your employees, and that it guides
the development of all of your systems, procedures, and practices.
Success starts with where you are going, and how your values &
strengths are going to help you (and your employees) get there.
All performance should be measured against these guiding statement
and principals.
-
Develop
fundamental Procedures and Systems to support the operation of your
business. This process doesn’t always require telephone book
sized binders and elaborate computer software to be effective. But
it must provide the basic direction and tools need to deliver uniform
service and quality. Also be sure that you (and your employees)
know which processes and practices are the most important to the
company’s success. Knowing which practices are critical to
success and continually refining them is a vital prerequisite for
getting there.
-
Develop
an annual Operating Plan with the participation of your key employees.
Again this doesn’t always have to involve hundreds of pages
of fine print and figures, just enough detail to provide the blueprints
for reaching your short and long-term goals. And since your employees
are your most important asset, you are much more likely to succeed
if they know where you are going and have contributed their ideas
on the best way to get there. A good plan increases employee engagement
and performance by optimizing allocation of resources and providing
benchmarks for performance.
-
Quantify
and monitor the impact of your plans and practices on workforce
engagement, as well as productivity, sales, and customer satisfaction.
You can’t hope to prosper without establishing performance
metrics for the functions and departments that are the most critical
to your success.
-
Adjust
plans and practices based upon actual performance, and direct feedback
from your workforce and customers. Nothing ever goes exactly as
planned and successful companies are extremely sensitive to changes
that can affect their business. Failing to recognize and make timely
changes is a sure way to lose the support and commitment of your
best employees.
- Profile your Top-Performers.
We’ve found this is one of the most important exercises for
improving overall performance. Profiling will increase the productivity
of your entire workforce by highlighting and adopting the characteristics
and work habits of the top performers in your key departments and
functions. They are also useful in developing position descriptions,
standards, and incentive plans, as well as, benchmarks for tracking
improvements in the overall workforce. Since these profiles are based
on superior performance inside your own firm, they are generally better
than relying solely on universal hiring criteria developed by outside
firms.
- Develop Results Focused
Position Descriptions, Performance Standards & Metrics. The emphasis
here is on Results Focused. It is not going to help performance to
merely describe the duties and responsibilities of a position without
also telling the employee what is expected of them. The focus is on
the skills required, results expected, how performance is measured,
and how the position contributes to personal and company success.
- Develop an Effective
Hiring Process using your internally developed profiles and results-focused
position descriptions. It goes without saying that hiring the wrong
person in the first place isn’t going to contribute to your
success. Also be sure you are satisfied that the candidate has the
prior work experience and track record required to achieve the results
you expect, and is strongly committed to doing so. Last but not least,
directly verify employment claims, check references, and complete
authorized background investigations.
- Develop Exit Interview
Plan & Monitor Employee Engagement. One of the most important
ways of making sure all of your practices are congruent, are being
followed, and are producing the desired ends. It your window into
the effectiveness and compatibility of all of your systems, procedures,
plans, and provides feedback for needed to make timely adjustments.
The exit interview process is especially important when one of your
top-performers decides to exit!
-
Develop
Merit Based Compensation, Incentive, and Recognition Programs. More
than 50 years of empirical studies have proven that behavior that
is rewarded is repeated. The reward doesn’t have to be exclusively
monetary, or large, but it must be based on a fair and above board
recognition of meritorious performance. So it is very important
that the behavior you are rewarding is consistent with your mission,
values, and goals. It has been our experience in large and small
organization that “Meritocracy” is an absolute requirement
for success. Certainly rewarding high producers has always led to
higher overall productivity. And just as important to any CEO or
HR manager, treating everyone the same drives the producers out,
leaving the mediocre to collect their paychecks.
-
Develop
& Strictly Administer Results-Oriented Performance Review and
Advancement Process. As is the case with position descriptions and
incentives, the focus here is on results. Nothing that we know of
is more essential to the engagement of productive employees than
a fair and objective performance review and advancement program.
It also facilitates the early departure of disengaged/unproductive
employees. Sadly, this is among the most common disconnects in unsuccessful
businesses. If you don’t tell your employees what you want
them to do, how it relates to their success, provide them with a
timely and objective feedback, and reward them accordingly …the
producers will leave and those who remain will decide for themselves
how to do their jobs at your expense.
-
Develop
Effective New-Hire Orientation Programs, including Employee Value
Formula™. This is your chance to give every new employee everything
they need to know to be successful while helping the company do
the same. In our experience the CEO should always play a key role
in this process in order to stress the importance of the mission,
values, and how their value (Value Formula™ ) will be determined
within the organization. This program is important step in developing
and retaining an engaged and productive workforce, and also protects
the company against complaints, litigation, and safety losses.
-
Develop
On-the-Job and Management Training and Education Development Programs.
Recent research by Allied Signal and Laurie Bassi, co-founder of
McBassi and Co. has established a clear link between strong leadership
and metrics related to strong company performance. Our own experience
confirms the extreme importance of leadership and employee training
in creating an engaged workforce and the resulting increased productivity
in companies of all sizes and shapes.
-
Regularly
Publish Individual, Team & Company Performance Metrics. This
is another time-tested means of increasing productivity, profitability,
and customer satisfaction by acknowledging meritorious performance,
while also shinning a bright light on less-than satisfactory performance.
-
Provide
means for Timely Communication & Feedback. This may be a bit
redundant, but we feel it is worth special mention. Our experience
and that of many other company executives and researchers has made
it abundantly clear that frequent and candid communication with
employees is essential for your company’s success. The Gallup
studies of thousands of organizations and their employees highlight
open and trusting relationships between employees, managers, and
top leadership as a primary contributor to strong commitment and
successful operations and results. And nothing fosters trusting
relationships than open and timely communication!
These programs and practices aren’t meant to cover every aspect
of managing a company. Instead they represent a set of affordable practices
that our experience as a CEO and a senior HR executive of more than
a dozen manufacturing and service companies has demonstrated can increase
engagement and productivity in your small to mid-sized company.
It is important to remember that a change in one practice can, and usually
does, impact the effectiveness of the others. This is especially true
when changes are made in any of the management practices, such as mission
or values. The hiring criteria and incentive programs originally designed
to foster rapid growth must be modified if a new mission emphasizing
unit profit is to succeed. And the chances of maintaining an engaged
and productive workforce are remote if the new appraisal and advancement
program (no matter how leading-edge) is inconsistent with the stated
mission and values of the company.
These statements also hold true regardless of the characteristics of
a company’s top management. An empathetic leader isn’t going
to be effective if their policies and practices are inconsistent, or
based on favoritism rather than merit. Human centric theories and practices
are important, but it has been our experience that they are only marginally
effective in a dysfunctional environment. It’s not the individual,
or the environment – it’s the combination that drives results.
The same can be said for the idea that simply hiring the best will lift
the performance of an organization. Focusing solely on hiring top-talent
often leads to a revolving door – in a dysfunctional organization,
the top-performers go out the back door as fast as you can bring them
in the front!
Summary
There is a broad consensus that continued growth in U.S. productivity
is vital to meeting the challenges presented by cheap foreign labor
in the 21st century. In fact, productivity growth has always meant a
rising standard of living for everyone and no other statistic is as
important for determining long-run economic welfare. Less well know
is the fact that more than eighty percent of net job growth in the U.S.
is now being created by small companies and that America’s future
prosperity will depend on the ability of these smaller companies to
effectively use their limited resources to consistently increase productivity.
These facts make it essential that companies of sizes overcome the common
misperception that increased productivity can be obtained by deploying
the latest technology. The authors believe that contrary to popular
belief, the principle resource for achieving sustained increases in
productivity, customer satisfaction, and profitability is an engaged
workforce. It is therefore vital for CEO’s and HR professionals
to avoid reliance on technology alone. To survive they must become proficient
in the systematic application of the management and employment practices
required to attract and retain the loyalty of a highly engaged workforce.
About
the Authors
H. Wilson Beach is Chairman of Abbott Resource Group,
Inc. and a founding member of GrowthPort Partners, Inc. In addition,
Mr. Beach has been the CEO of a number of public and private companies
in the specialty chemical, marketing, precision instruments, financial
services, staffing, and human capital outsourcing industries. His 35-year
record of leadership includes everything from startups to sustained
growth companies, plus numerous turnarounds and consolidations in mature
industries.
P. Anthony Burnham, Esq. Burnham’s is President
and Employment Council for GrowthPort Partners, Inc. Mr. Burnham previously
spent more than 20 years as Employment Counsel and VP of Human Resources
Management for Carnation/Nestle U.S.A. Subsequently he was of counsel
to the Orange County office of Fisher & Phillips LLP, a prominent,
national employment law firm, Executive VP and Employment Counsel to
Abbott Resource Group, Inc., and Senior Vice President and Employment
Council for the Employers Group. Burnham is the author of “Employed
for Life, an Insider’s Secrets for Guaranteed Employment in our
Permanently Changed Workplace.”
Leslie Gray is CEO of GrowthPort Partners, Inc. Her
extensive management experience includes positions as Vice President
of the Employers Group, COO of the Human Capital Co-op, LLC, Founder
of Innovative Business Strategies, LLC, Vice President of the Risk Management
Division of ManagEase, Incorporated. In addition to the senior management
positions, Leslie has held positions as Director of Human Resources
for two Southern-California based law firms, one, a spin-off from Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher, and another spin-off from Buchanan Ingersoll, et.
al., in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Leslie holds multiple state professional
licenses in life and disability insurance and securities, (Series 6
and 63), is a Certified Safety Specialist and holds a Masters Certification
in Environmental Health and Safety. Leslie attended the University of
Pittsburgh School of Business Administration and is also a certified
Paralegal.
Bibliography
The American Economy, The Economist Newspaper, October 26, 2006.
BLS Office of Occupational Statistics and Employment Projections, Total
hours worked 200 detailed industries for 1958-2004
Batt, R. (2002). “Managing Customer Services: Human Resource Practices,
Quit Rates, and Sales Growth.” Academy of Management Journal,
45: 587-597.
Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.”
Journal of Management, 17(1), 99.
Cron, W.L., Slocum, J.V., Goodnight, D.B., & Volk, J.O. (1999) “Impact
of management practices and business behaviors on small animal veterinarians’
incomes.” JAVMA Executive Summary.
Friedman, Thomas L. (2005). “The World is Flat, A Brief History
of the 21st Century,” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, NY, NY.
Gallop. (2005) “Employee Engagement - The Employee Side of the
HumanSigma Equation,” www.gallupconsulting.com/content/?ci=52
Gevity Institute — Cornell University (2005), Human Resource Practices
in Small Medical and Legal Practices: The Impact of a High Commitment
Approach to Managing Employees.
Gevity Institute — Cornell University (2005), Human Resource Management
Practices and Firm Performance in Small Businesses, Report #2.
Grossman, Robert J., (2006). “Measuring the Value of HR, American
Standard is taking big strides in showing the connection between good
HR and a healthy bottom line.” Society for Human Resource Management.
Alexandria,Virginia
Hamilton, James (2005). “The under-reported good news about productivity,”
Ecobrowser, August 12, 2005.
Hess, D. W. (1987). “Relevance of small business courses to management
needs.” Journal of Small Business Management, 25(1), 26.
Hornsby, J. S., & Kuratko, D. F. (2003). “Human resource management
in U.S. small businesses: A replication and extension.” Journal
of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 73.
Huselid, M. (1995). “The impact of human resource management practices
on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance.”
Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-672.
Jorgenson, Dale W., Ho, Mun S., Stiroh, Kevin. (2006).“The Sources
of the Second Surge of U.S. Productivity Growth and Implications for
the Future.” Perspective on Potential Output and Productivity
Growth Bank of France, April 24, 2006.
Macduffie, J. P. (1995). “Human resource bundles and manufacturing
performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in
the world auto industry.” Industrial & labor relations review,
48: 197-221.
Richard, O. C. & Johnson, N. B. (2001). “Strategic human resource
management effectiveness and firm performance.” International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 12: 299-310.
Rogg, K. L., Schmidt, D. B., Shull, C. & Schmitt, N. (2001). “Human
resource practices, organizational climate, and customer satisfaction.”
Journal of Management, 27: 431-450.
Stiroh, Kevin J. (2002). “Information Technology and the U.S.
Productivity Revival:
A Review of the Evidence,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New
York NY, 10045.
Stiroh, Kevin J. (2006). “The Industry Origins of the Second Surge
of U.S. Productivity Growth.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Welbourne, T. M., & Cyr, L. A. (1999). “The human resource
executive effect in initial public offering firms.” Academy of
Management Journal, 42(6), 616.
Welbourne, T. M., & Andrews, A. O. (1996). “Predicting the
performance of initial public offerings: Should human resource management
be in..” Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 891.
Wright, P.M., Gardner, T.M., Moynihan, L.M., & Allen, M.R. (2005).
“The relationship between HR practices and firm performance: examining
the causal order.” Personnel Psychology, 58
|

|
|
Studies have determined that Employee-involvement practices
generate a 66 percent higher return on sales, 20 percent higher
return on assets, 20 percent higher return on investments,
and a 13 percent higher return on equity.
Ed Lawler & Susan Mohrman, USC Center for Effective Organizations,
Workforce, December, 2001. Research indicates
25% of managers time is spent on conflict-related issues.
Unresolved conflicts impede operations, decrease productivity
and increase negative attitudes among staffers
Philip Chard, a psychologist and CEO of NEAS, Inc, 2001. |
|
|